Estimation of externalities for atmospheric contamination associated with bagasse burning

Main Article Content

Alina Roig-Rassi
Elieza Meneses-Ruiz
Iveitty Soto-Guevara

Abstract

The generation of electricity from fossil fuels produces different negative impacts. These impacts caused by the generation of electricity are consider External Costs or Externalities when they are not included in the prices of the energy market and therefore distort optimal economic decisions. The use of bagasse in Cuba for the generation of electricity take place mainly in sugar mills with dual purpose, the production of heat and electricity. The work determines the atmospheric externalities of the use of bagasse as an energy source from particulate matter emissions. Was used the Impact Pathway Methodology. Considering two scenarios were evaluated three plants: base and mitigation. The highest damage costs were for Uruguay sugar mill (667.2 MCUC). The averages of externalities for the scenario bases for impact on health was of 1.2 CUC/kWh, value that belongs together with those reported by the European studies for the production of heat and electricity from the bagasse burning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Roig-RassiA., Meneses-RuizE., & Soto-GuevaraI. (2018). Estimation of externalities for atmospheric contamination associated with bagasse burning. Revista Cubana De Meteorología, 24, 385-395. Retrieved from http://rcm.insmet.cu/index.php/rcm/article/view/444
Section
Original Articles

References

CASES (2008): European Commission, 2008. Project No 518294 SES6, CASES - Cost Assessment of Sustainable Energy Systems, WP6 - DELIVERABLE D.6.1. “Full cost estimates of the use of different energy sources". Last update: September 2008
EPA (2001): Technology Transfer Network Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric, http://www.epa.gov/scram001/dispersion_prefrec.htm#aermod
EPA (2001b): Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources. Updates 2001 to present.
EPA (2017): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards BenMAP-Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program, User’s Manual. Abt Associates Inc.: US EPA; April 2017.
ExternE (2005): European Commission, ExternE (2005), Externalities of Energy: Methodology 2005 Update, (EUR 21951), Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, L-2920, Luxembourg, F75272, Paris, Cedex 06, France
Meneses et al (2008). PROGRAMA NACIONAL DESARROLLO ENERGÉTICO SOSTENIBLE. Código del proyecto: 00613312, Externalidades del transporte. Propuesta de funciones exposición-respuesta a emplear en los estudios de externalidades del transporte.
Meneses et al (2016). Salida de proyecto No. 1-2016: “METODOLOGÍA EVALUACIÓN DE IMPACTOS Y COSTOS”. Proyecto, “Evaluación de externalidades ambientales de tecnologías energéticas en Cuba”. Código: P211LH003-017, Programa Energía Renovable.
NC 1020: 2014 CALIDAD DEL AIRE - CONTAMINANTES - CONCENTRACIONES MÁXIMAS ADMISIBLES Y VALORES GUÍAS EN ZONAS HABITABLES.
ONEI (2017): Anuario estadístico de Cuba 2015, ONEI (2017): Anuario estadístico de Cuba 2015, http://www.onei.cu , consultado mayo 2017
Ostro B. (1996). A Methodology for Estimating Air Pollution Health Effects, World Health Organization, Ginebra.
Rabl. (2002). Airpacts exposure response functions. Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency
WHO (2000): World Health Organization. Evaluation and use of epidemiological evidence for environmental health risk assessment. Guideline document. Copenhagen. WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Most read articles by the same author(s)