Policies and instruments for adaptation to climate change of the ecosystem services humedal el burro
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The El Burro wetland is an important ecosystem due to the variety of ecosystem services that contribute to human well-being, as part of the capital district wetland complex due to its strategic attributes under the Ramsar Convention. However, this ecosystem is affected by pollutants that enter its tributaries, ecological fragmentation, disturbance of fauna due to its proximity to urban infrastructure, among other situations that gradually decrease the quality of its ecosystem services.
The objective of the project was to analyze the public policies and economic instruments that allow the recovery of the ecosystem services of the El Burro wetland as strategies for adaptation to climate change. For this, the interrelationships of wetland policy and public policies were analyzed, the economic instruments that could be implemented for the restoration and recovery of ecosystem services in the El Burro wetland in Bogotá and what strategies have been developed for management were analyzed. of climate change, under the principle of prevention.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. They are accepted to publish original scientific papers, research results of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of equipment, instruments or specific materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
References
Brancalion, P. H. (2019). The potential of ecological restoration to reduce poverty and inequality. . Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(4), 439-448.
Calvachi, B. (2016). Humedales de Kennedy “dinámica social, ambiental y urbana”. Bogotá. Obtenido de https://humedalesbogota.com/libro-los-humedales-de-kennedy-dinamica- social-ambiental-y-urbana/
Costanza, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. . Biological Conservation, 141(2), 350-352.
Erwin, K. L. (2009). The role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 17(1), 71-84.
Hernandez, R. R. (2018). Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. . Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(2), 59-67.
Hobbs, R. J. (2019). Restoration ecology and the future of ecosystems. . Science, 364(6443), eaav4858.
IDECA. (2017). Cobertura vegetal en humedales. Obtenido de Alcaldia mayor de Bogotá: https://www.ideca.gov.co/recursos/mapas/cobertura-vegetal-en-humedales-de-bogota
Instituto de Estudios Ambientales. (2008a). Plan De Manejo Ambiental Del Humedal Burro- Problemática, Valoración Y Evaluación. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 43. http://ambientebogota.gov.co/documents/10157/75fa09ff-a9a6-47c0-aa75-1151fbd547b4
Instituto de Estudios Ambientales. (2008b). Plan de manejo ambiental del humedal el burro- Caracterización diagnóstica. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 236.
Laestadius, L. B.-L. (2019). Forest landscape restoration for livelihoods and well-being. In Forest and Land Use Governance for Mitigation and Adaptation, (pp. 101-120). Springer, Cham.
Lavorel, S. E. (2014). Ecosystem services for human well-being: A framework for assessment. . Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(6), 351-357.
Middleton, B. A. (2013). Wetland restoration, flood pulsing, and disturbance dynamics. Journal of Coastal Researc, 1659-1663.
Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá. (2006). Política de humedales del Distrito Capital. Bogotá. Obtenido de http://ambientebogota.gov.co/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=b3186a1c-c2a6-4cae-8e85- 3eaecfee4fb7&groupId=55886
Brancalion, P. H. (2019). The potential of ecological restoration to reduce poverty and inequality. . Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(4), 439-448.
Calvachi, B. (2016). Humedales de Kennedy “dinámica social, ambiental y urbana”. Bogotá. Obtenido de https://humedalesbogota.com/libro-los-humedales-de-kennedy-dinamica- social-ambiental-y-urbana/
Costanza, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. . Biological Conservation, 141(2), 350-352.
Erwin, K. L. (2009). The role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 17(1), 71-84.
Hernandez, R. R. (2018). Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. . Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(2), 59-67.
Hobbs, R. J. (2019). Restoration ecology and the future of ecosystems. . Science, 364(6443), eaav4858.
IDECA. (2017). Cobertura vegetal en humedales. Obtenido de Alcaldia mayor de Bogotá: https://www.ideca.gov.co/recursos/mapas/cobertura-vegetal-en-humedales-de-bogota
Instituto de Estudios Ambientales. (2008a). Plan De Manejo Ambiental Del Humedal Burro- Problemática, Valoración Y Evaluación. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 43. http://ambientebogota.gov.co/documents/10157/75fa09ff-a9a6-47c0-aa75-1151fbd547b4
Instituto de Estudios Ambientales. (2008b). Plan de manejo ambiental del humedal el burro- Caracterización diagnóstica. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 236.
Laestadius, L. B.-L. (2019). Forest landscape restoration for livelihoods and well-being. In Forest and Land Use Governance for Mitigation and Adaptation, (pp. 101-120). Springer, Cham.
Lavorel, S. E. (2014). Ecosystem services for human well-being: A framework for assessment. . Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(6), 351-357.
Middleton, B. A. (2013). Wetland restoration, flood pulsing, and disturbance dynamics. Journal of Coastal Researc, 1659-1663.
Moreno-Mateos, D. P. (2012). Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. . PLoS Biology, 10(1), e1001247.
Reyers, B. C. (2013). Ecosystem services and climate change adaptation: Identifying and amplifying positive feedbacks. Ecological Economics, 85, 268-276.
ROMERO, C. (1993). Teoría de la decisión multicriterio: conceptos, técnicas y aplicaciones (No. 338 ROM)
Sills, E. K. (2019). Ecosystem-based adaptation for smallholder farmers: Opportunities and barriers. . Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 461-472.
Sukhdev, P. W.-S. (2018). Natural capital accounting and the sustainability paradigm. . In Ecological Economics of Sustainable Watershed Management , (pp. 1-19). Springer, Cham.
Turner, R. K. (2016). Valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity: The case of multi-scale assessment in coastal habitats. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 20(1), 1-11.
Vargas, C. I.-A. (2017). Integrating ecosystem services into climate change adaptation planning: A conceptual framework. . Climate Risk Managemen, 16, 39-52.
Zedler, J. B. (2005). Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. . Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 39-74.